[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180627150641.p56xyy6mdzvnfpig@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:06:41 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Namit Gupta <gupta.namit@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pankaj.m@...sung.com,
a.sahrawat@...sung.com, himanshu.m@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: remove unnecessary kmalloc() from syslog during
clear
On Tue 2018-06-26 10:39:59, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:43:32 +0200
> Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon 2018-06-25 23:44:07, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > On (06/25/18 10:37), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is IMHO rather ugly.
> > >
> > > Either way works for me. So I'll leave it to you and Petr to decide :)
> > >
> > > > And the original patch has one more advantage. If buf and clear are
> > > > both NULL/zero, we don't take any locks.
> > >
> > > But we never use syslog_print_all(buf = NULL, clear = false). It's either
> > > NULL/true [move forward clear idx, do not copy to user], or !NULL/use defined
> > > value [copy to user, move or don't move clear idx forward]
> >
> > Yup, I suggest the following version as a compromise. It has the code
> > duplication but I agree that it is negligible. Otherwise, it looks
> > cleaner.
> >
>
> This looks fine. For proper history though, what I do in this case,
> would be to make this into two patches. One with Namit's original
> patch, and then a second that removes the code duplication (your patch).
Makes sense. I have just pushed the original patch (with Sergey's
formatting fixes) into printk.git, for-4.19 branch. And I propose
the clean up patch, see below.
I am sorry for the mess. It seems that nothing can be considered
a simple obvious change. And my attempt to safe people time had
the opposite effect.
Proposed patch:
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:37:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] printk: Clean up syslog_print_all()
syslog_print_all() is called twice. Once with a valid buffer
and once just to set the indexes.
Both variants are already handled separately. This patch just
makes it more obvious. It does not change the existing behavior.
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
---
kernel/printk/printk.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 16b02cc51a14..fcc1992c040a 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -1356,16 +1356,6 @@ static int syslog_print_all(char __user *buf, int size, bool clear)
u64 seq;
u32 idx;
- if (!buf) {
- if (clear) {
- logbuf_lock_irq();
- clear_seq = log_next_seq;
- clear_idx = log_next_idx;
- logbuf_unlock_irq();
- }
- return 0;
- }
-
text = kmalloc(LOG_LINE_MAX + PREFIX_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!text)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1437,6 +1427,14 @@ static int syslog_print_all(char __user *buf, int size, bool clear)
return len;
}
+static void syslog_clear(void)
+{
+ logbuf_lock_irq();
+ clear_seq = log_next_seq;
+ clear_idx = log_next_idx;
+ logbuf_unlock_irq();
+}
+
int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, int source)
{
bool clear = false;
@@ -1481,7 +1479,7 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, int source)
break;
/* Clear ring buffer */
case SYSLOG_ACTION_CLEAR:
- syslog_print_all(NULL, 0, true);
+ syslog_clear();
break;
/* Disable logging to console */
case SYSLOG_ACTION_CONSOLE_OFF:
--
2.13.7
Powered by blists - more mailing lists