[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180628084612.GB7646@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 01:46:12 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xarray tree with the
wireless-drivers-next tree
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 09:51:09AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 14:59 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the xarray tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > lib/Kconfig.debug
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 0e2dc70e3d0d ("bitfield: add tests")
> >
> > from the wireless-drivers-next tree and commit:
> >
> > d968f529e39f ("xarray: Add XArray load operation")
> >
> > from the xarray tree.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up! Not really sure where/how we'll be able to get
> that resolved before it hits Linus, but as the conflict seems rather
> easy (overlapping additions), I guess it's not such a big deal.
I don't care which order the tests are presented in. I'll happily move the
XArray addition to a different location in the file.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists