[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87in63s38j.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:51:40 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xarray tree with the wireless-drivers-next tree
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
> On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 14:59 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the xarray tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> lib/Kconfig.debug
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 0e2dc70e3d0d ("bitfield: add tests")
>>
>> from the wireless-drivers-next tree and commit:
>>
>> d968f529e39f ("xarray: Add XArray load operation")
>>
>> from the xarray tree.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up! Not really sure where/how we'll be able to get
> that resolved before it hits Linus, but as the conflict seems rather
> easy (overlapping additions), I guess it's not such a big deal.
Yeah, I would assume this is business as usual for Linus and we don't
need to do anything. But please do let me know if that's not the case.
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists