lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87in63s38j.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:51:40 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xarray tree with the wireless-drivers-next tree

Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:

> On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 14:59 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Today's linux-next merge of the xarray tree got a conflict in:
>> 
>>   lib/Kconfig.debug
>> 
>> between commit:
>> 
>>   0e2dc70e3d0d ("bitfield: add tests")
>> 
>> from the wireless-drivers-next tree and commit:
>> 
>>   d968f529e39f ("xarray: Add XArray load operation")
>> 
>> from the xarray tree.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up! Not really sure where/how we'll be able to get
> that resolved before it hits Linus, but as the conflict seems rather
> easy (overlapping additions), I guess it's not such a big deal.

Yeah, I would assume this is business as usual for Linus and we don't
need to do anything. But please do let me know if that's not the case.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ