[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180628021603.GB481@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:16:03 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] printk: Create helper function to queue deferred
console handling
On (06/27/18 16:08), Petr Mladek wrote:
> -int vprintk_deferred(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> +void defer_console(void)
> {
> - int r;
> -
> - r = vprintk_emit(0, LOGLEVEL_SCHED, NULL, 0, fmt, args);
> -
> preempt_disable();
> __this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT);
> irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&wake_up_klogd_work));
> preempt_enable();
> +}
> +
> +int vprintk_deferred(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> +{
> + int r;
> +
> + r = vprintk_emit(0, LOGLEVEL_SCHED, NULL, 0, fmt, args);
> + defer_console();
>
> return r;
You can just call vprintk_emit(LOGLEVEL_SCHED) from vprintk_func(),
then you don't need to factor out vprintk_deferred() and vprintk_emit().
Any reason for that split?
I'd also may be prefer to have a bit different name. I'm talking
about defer_console().
Other than that
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists