[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iWOo2fqd3Z73Ge55nF719j2Dtt=hW7O-kxL75jTkxQoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:15:17 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: memremap: change devm_memremap_pages interface to use struct dev_pagemap
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Colin Ian King
<colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> static analysis with CoverityScan detected an issue with the following
> commit:
>
> commit e8d5134833006a46fcbefc5f4a84d0b62bd520e7
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Date: Fri Dec 29 08:54:05 2017 +0100
>
> memremap: change devm_memremap_pages interface to use struct dev_pagemap
>
>
> 247 }
> 248
> CID 1464431 (#1 of 1): Unchecked return value (CHECKED_RETURN)
> check_return: Calling devm_add_action without checking return value (as
> is done elsewhere 33 out of 35 times).
>
> 249 devm_add_action(dev, devm_memremap_pages_release, pgmap);
> 250
> 251 return __va(res->start);
>
> devm_add_action can fail and return -ENOMEM because it calls
> devres_alloc which can fail in an out of memory situation. So I believe
> it may be pertinent to add a -ENOMEM check and clean up appropriately.
> I'm not sure of the correct way to perform the error clean up, so I'm
> sending this report instead of a fix.
Thanks for this. We have a fix pending here looking to go through Andrew's tree.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10473317/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists