linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: dts: imx6sl-evk: keep sw4 always on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMZO5BjOEGWv2dC-bp0BYHq+PhLssEKic+o7ock8_1Dobd=sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 1 Jul 2018 20:32:49 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Yongcai Huang <anson.huang@....com>
Cc:     Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: dts: imx6sl-evk: keep sw4 always on

On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 08:34:11PM +0800, Robin Gong wrote:
>> SW4 is one power rail for LPDDR2 on i.mx6sl-evk, so it should
>> be kept always on. But it's disabled after switch disabled
>> interface implemented in pfuze driver
>> 'commit 5fe156f1cab4
>> ("regulator: pfuze100: add enable/disable for switch")'.Thus,
>> it breaks kernel bootup. Add 'regulator-always-on' for SW4.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
>
> Does that mean boards with existing DTB installed will stop working with
> new kernel?  That's bad, and the kernel commit should probably be
> reverted.

Yes, this is a good point.

Anson,

Should 5fe156f1cab4 ("regulator: pfuze100: add enable/disable for
switch") be reverted to avoid such breakage?