[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <345aed22-629a-abf6-df22-adee88a43df6@lechnology.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:27:53 -0500
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the
reset framework
On 07/02/2018 07:08 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Thursday 21 June 2018 05:11 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> 2018-06-21 12:52 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>:
>>> Hi Bartosz,
>>>
>>> On Thursday 21 June 2018 01:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>>>
>>>> These are the remaining patches that still need to be merged in order
>>>> to complete the conversion of the davinci dsp driver to using the reset
>>>> framework.
>>>>
>>>> They apply on top of v4.18-rc1 with David Lechner's remaining patches
>>>> merged.
>>>
>>> Series looks good to me.
>>>
>>> To preserve bisect, shouldn't the order of applying be patch #3, #4, #1
>>> and #2 ?
>>>
>>> Given the dependencies and to preserve bisect its easiest if I take the
>>> series with acks from remoteproc and clock maintainers.
>>>
>>> Open to other suggestions as well.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sekhar
>>
>> Oops you're right about the order. Do you want me to resend?
>
> With your ack, I can queue 1/4 for v4.19 and provide an immutable commit
> to you (on top of v4.18-rc1) for you to merge any further changes you
> want to queue from your tree.
>
> Bartosz, given the number of moving pieces, I think its better to keep
> 2/4 for v4.20 release - once all other other dependencies have been merged.
I was thinking the same thing as well. I will pick it up in a
clk-davinci-4.20 branch if that sounds OK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists