[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03256c00-c23f-68c4-c62b-fb4b85547551@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:12:55 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the
reset framework
On Monday 02 July 2018 08:57 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 07/02/2018 07:08 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> On Thursday 21 June 2018 05:11 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> 2018-06-21 12:52 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>:
>>>> Hi Bartosz,
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday 21 June 2018 01:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> These are the remaining patches that still need to be merged in order
>>>>> to complete the conversion of the davinci dsp driver to using the
>>>>> reset
>>>>> framework.
>>>>>
>>>>> They apply on top of v4.18-rc1 with David Lechner's remaining patches
>>>>> merged.
>>>>
>>>> Series looks good to me.
>>>>
>>>> To preserve bisect, shouldn't the order of applying be patch #3, #4, #1
>>>> and #2 ?
>>>>
>>>> Given the dependencies and to preserve bisect its easiest if I take the
>>>> series with acks from remoteproc and clock maintainers.
>>>>
>>>> Open to other suggestions as well.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sekhar
>>>
>>> Oops you're right about the order. Do you want me to resend?
>>
>> With your ack, I can queue 1/4 for v4.19 and provide an immutable commit
>> to you (on top of v4.18-rc1) for you to merge any further changes you
>> want to queue from your tree.
>>
>> Bartosz, given the number of moving pieces, I think its better to keep
>> 2/4 for v4.20 release - once all other other dependencies have been
>> merged.
>
> I was thinking the same thing as well. I will pick it up in a
> clk-davinci-4.20 branch if that sounds OK.
Sounds good. Just check that there really are no users of that API
before queuing :)
Regards,
Sekhar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists