linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] mfd: bd71837: mfd driver for ROHM BD71837 PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFqH_53qUTeTcG1ijX-pbfgwwEes-f9i5MzOtv4eeM03V2Bq1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:09:53 +0200
From:   Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, sboyd@...nel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, chenjh@...k-chips.com,
        Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, mikko.mutanen@...rohmeurope.com,
        heikki.haikola@...rohmeurope.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] mfd: bd71837: mfd driver for ROHM BD71837 PMIC

Hi,
Missatge de Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> del dia dt., 3 de jul.
2018 a les 8:56:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
>
> > Hi Matti,
> >
> > Missatge de Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> del
> > dia dt., 26 de juny 2018 a les 14:03:
> > >
> > > Hello Again Eric,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0200, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> > > > Hi Matti,
> > > > Missatge de Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> del
> > > > dia dt., 26 de juny 2018 a les 13:25:
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:06:33AM +0200, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> > > > > > Missatge de Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> del
> > > > > > dia dt., 19 de juny 2018 a les 12:57:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > +static const struct of_device_id bd71837_of_match[] = {
> > > > > > > +       { .compatible = "rohm,bd71837", .data = (void *)0},
> > > > > > > +       { },
> > > > > >
> > > > > > nit: { /* sentinel */ }
> > > > >
> > > > > I am sorry but I didn't quite get the point here. Could you please
> > > > > explain what did you expect to be added here?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's a nit but It is a good practice to specify that the last entry is
> > > > a sentinel. Just this.
> > > >
> > > > +static const struct of_device_id bd71837_of_match[] = {
> > > > +       { .compatible = "rohm,bd71837", .data = (void *)0},
> > > > +       { /* sentinel */ }
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > Oh, I see. Finally something I can disagree =) I quickly opened few
> > > random drivers which declare match table. None of them practiced this
> > > good practice. So I guess it is not such a standard after all. And I
> > > guess the meaning of last entry in match table should be quite obvious.
> > > Adding the comment /* sentinel */ sounds like stating the obvious at
> > > best - at worst it gets one just to wonder what the "sentinel" means =)
> > >
> >
> > git grep "/\* sentinel \*/"
> >
> > Anyway, I marked this change as a nit, so you don't need to change. I
> > just commented because at some point I received a "complain" when I
> > didn't add it. But this is up to the maintainer and I am not sure if
> > the "complain" was received in this subsystem :)
>
> Certainly not from me.  I don't agree with the practice.
>
Ok, Removed from my notes.

> I'd like to know who is enforcing this!

I tried to find from where my note comes from but I did not find it.
Anyway, it's clear now that you don't like it, so I'll remove from the
pending patches I have and see if someone complains about it again.

Thanks,
 Enric

>
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
> Linaro Services Technical Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog