[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55b86851-4978-9289-8a1f-012c6114ec9e@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 19:25:21 +0800
From: lijiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, joro@...tes.org,
thomas.lendacky@....com, dyoung@...hat.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
bhe@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 V5] Add a function(ioremap_encrypted) for kdump when
AMD sme enabled
在 2018年07月03日 17:39, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:17:19AM +0800, lijiang wrote:
>> for example, the elfcorehdr. In fact, the elfcorehdr and notes
>
> You mean this?
>
> ssize_t __weak elfcorehdr_read_notes(char *buf, size_t count, u64 *ppos)
> {
> - return read_from_oldmem(buf, count, ppos, 0);
> + return read_from_oldmem(buf, count, ppos, 0, sme_active());
>
> That looks encrypted to me.
>
The elf notes is an old memory, it is encrypted.
But the elf header is a crash kernel reserved memory, which is unencrypted.
ssize_t __weak elfcorehdr_read(char *buf, size_t count, u64 *ppos)
{
- return read_from_oldmem(buf, count, ppos, 0);
+ return read_from_oldmem(buf, count, ppos, 0, false);
}
They call the same function(read_from_oldmem->ioremap_cache), so it is hard to
properly remap the memory if we don't use the parameter to distinguish.
Regards,
Lianbo
>> call the same function(read_from_oldmem->ioremap_cache), in this case,
>> it is very difficult to properly remap the memory if the caller don't
>> care whether the memory is encrypted.
>
> So beef up the logic in __ioremap_caller() to figure out based on the
> address whether to access the memory encrypted or not. You can find out
> the elfcorehdr address in the capture kernel.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists