linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5 V5] Add a function(ioremap_encrypted) for kdump when AMD sme enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 19:44:40 +0800
From:   lijiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        hpa@...or.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, joro@...tes.org,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, dyoung@...hat.com,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        bhe@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 V5] Add a function(ioremap_encrypted) for kdump when
 AMD sme enabled

在 2018年07月03日 19:14, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:58:14PM +0800, lijiang wrote:
>> For kdump, the elf header finally use the crash kernel reserved memory, it is not an old memory.
> 
> Lamme repeat my suggestion:
> 
> So beef up the logic in __ioremap_caller() to figure out based on the
> address whether to access the memory encrypted or not. In general, you
> can deduce, based on the region you're mapping, whether you need to map
> in encrypted or decrypted.
> 
> For example:
> 
>         addr = elfcorehdr_addr;
> 
>         /* Read Elf header */
>         rc = elfcorehdr_read((char *)&ehdr, sizeof(Elf64_Ehdr), &addr);
>         if (rc < 0)
>                 return rc;
> 
> elfcorehdr_addr has that elfcorehdr address. So you can check which address
> you're mapping and do:
> 
> __ioremap_caller:
> 
> ...
> 	prot = __ioremap_compute_prot(...);
> 
> and that __ioremap_compute_prot() function which you will add will have
> all that logic to determine encrypted or not by comparing addresses etc.
> 
> Does that make more sense?
> 
Thank you, Boris. Good idea, I will rethink about this issue and post it again.

Regards,
Lianbo