linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] RISC-V: Add definiion of extract symbol's index and type for 32-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <mhng-640c8a78-7e3a-4ccf-9951-fc85a0969b9c@palmer-si-x1c4>
Date:   Wed, 04 Jul 2018 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
To:     zongbox@...il.com
CC:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, zong@...estech.com,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        greentime@...estech.com
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] RISC-V: Add definiion of extract symbol's index and type for 32-bit

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:53:49 PDT (-0700), zongbox@...il.com wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> 於 2018年6月29日 週五 下午3:12寫道：
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 04:49:39PM +0800, Zong Li wrote:
>> > Use generic marco to get the index and type of symbol.
>>
>> Why do we even need this in a uapi header?  Shouldn't ELF_RISCV_R_SYM
>> and ELF_RISCV_R_TYPE move to module.c?  In that case we could just
>> use CONFIG_64BIT.
>
> Make sense. I even think the all definitions can be move to include/asm/elf.h.
> How do you think about that?

Sorry I've been slow about reviewing this, but I think just in the interest of 
getting a sane RV32I port up and running quickly (so we can try to get glibc in 
shape) I'm going to take this for now.

Do you mind submitting a cleanup patch?