[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFovmZxR=Bv0rogas+RTkzkSwbcyRyu1pD4m0LYvExbY8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 13:23:13 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: allow 1.8V modes without
100/200MHz pinctrl states
On 4 July 2018 at 17:07, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch> wrote:
> If pinctrl nodes for 100/200MHz are missing, the controller should
> not select any mode which need signal frequencies 100MHz or higher.
> To prevent such speed modes the driver currently uses the quirk flag
> SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V. This works nicely for SD cards since 1.8V
> signaling is required for all faster modes and slower modes use 3.3V
> signaling only.
>
> However, there are eMMC modes which use 1.8V signaling and run below
> 100MHz, e.g. DDR52 at 1.8V. With using SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V this
> mode is prevented. When using a fixed 1.8V regulator as vqmmc-supply
> the stack has no valid mode to use. In this tenuous situation the
> kernel continuously prints voltage switching errors:
> mmc1: Switching to 3.3V signalling voltage failed
>
> Avoid using SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V and prevent faster modes by
> altering the SDHCI capability register. With that the stack is able
> to select 1.8V modes even if no faster pinctrl states are available:
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/mmc1/ios
> ...
> timing spec: 8 (mmc DDR52)
> signal voltage: 1 (1.80 V)
> ...
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180628081331.13051-1-stefan@agner.ch
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
I am fine with this. Do you want me to apply this for now, to get it tested?
I guess its also material for stable and as fix?
In regards to the printed warning, it sounds to me like a different
issue, which we can solve on top. Right?
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists