linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 08/12] atomics: switch to generated fallbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180705172306.GG2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jul 2018 19:23:06 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        will.deacon@....com, andy.shevchenko@...il.com, arnd@...db.de,
        aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, dvyukov@...gle.com, glider@...gle.com,
        hpa@...or.com, linuxdrivers@...otech.com, mingo@...nel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, parri.andrea@...il.com, peter@...leysoftware.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 08/12] atomics: switch to generated fallbacks

On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 05:40:49PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:

> * The fallbacks are not expected to change very often, and are not
>   affected by machine details or configuration options, so regenerating
>   them for *every* build is somewhat wasteful.

Except of course, your last patch in this series now does exactly that
:-)