linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 09/13] x86/sgx: EPC page allocation routines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180705182109.GA5353@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jul 2018 21:21:09 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
        npmccallum@...hat.com, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/13] x86/sgx: EPC page allocation routines

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 06:25:53AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> ... and also, why are the other exports not EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?

I think they could just as well be that. No reason to use
EXPORT_SYMBOL() even if the source files are dual licensed.

/Jarkko