[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUdxS5JGJMKjBGWhaLM8yqzW+MjVcmF4QgczQQfFFOk3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 14:46:35 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@...oraproject.org>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>,
Cary Coutant <ccoutant@...il.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 2/4] x86: Add build salt to the vDSO
Sure.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 07/05/2018 08:58 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The vDSO needs to have a unique build id in a similar manner
>>> to the kernel and modules. Use the build salt macro.
>>>
>>
>> Looks good to me. I have no idea whose tree these would go through.
>>
>
> I was intending this to go through kbuild tree. Can I take this
> as an Ack?
>
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>> v5: Switched to using the single line BUILD_SALT macro
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso-note.S | 3 +++
>>> arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/note.S | 3 +++
>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso-note.S
>>> b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso-note.S
>>> index 79a071e4357e..79423170118f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso-note.S
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso-note.S
>>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>> * Here we can supply some information useful to userland.
>>> */
>>>
>>> +#include <linux/build-salt.h>
>>> #include <linux/uts.h>
>>> #include <linux/version.h>
>>> #include <linux/elfnote.h>
>>> @@ -10,3 +11,5 @@
>>> ELFNOTE_START(Linux, 0, "a")
>>> .long LINUX_VERSION_CODE
>>> ELFNOTE_END
>>> +
>>> +BUILD_SALT
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/note.S
>>> b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/note.S
>>> index 9fd51f206314..e78047d119f6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/note.S
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/note.S
>>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>>> * Here we can supply some information useful to userland.
>>> */
>>>
>>> +#include <linux/build-salt.h>
>>> #include <linux/version.h>
>>> #include <linux/elfnote.h>
>>>
>>> @@ -14,6 +15,8 @@ ELFNOTE_START(Linux, 0, "a")
>>> .long LINUX_VERSION_CODE
>>> ELFNOTE_END
>>>
>>> +BUILD_SALT
>>> +
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_XEN
>>> /*
>>> * Add a special note telling glibc's dynamic linker a fake hardware
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists