linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] scsi: ncr53c8xx: remove ScsiResult macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180706080939.iotmgb24f6iaawkp@linux-x5ow.site>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jul 2018 10:09:39 +0200
From:   Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
To:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Cc:     "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] scsi: ncr53c8xx: remove ScsiResult macro

On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 05:04:05PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 13:01 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > -		cmd->result = ScsiResult(DID_OK, S_CHECK_COND);
> > +		cmd->result = DID_OK << 16 | S_CHECK_COND;
> 
> Since DID_OK == 0, do we really need "DID_OK << 16 |" here?

Please see my answers to the other patches on this.

Thanks,
	Johannes

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@...e.de                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850