linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: Really show symbolic clock flags in debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWKsC74T5EZ-iPaWK6d+ZZQLXp4dzbXb3PFA1+hprcbKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:18:09 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Really show symbolic clock flags in debugfs

Hi Stephen,

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 5:12 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2018-07-04 06:01:03)
> > The last-minute fold-in of the ENTRY() macro did change behavior:
> > instead of printing the symbolic name (e.g. "CLK_IS_BASIC"), it prints
> > the expansion of it (e.g. "(1UL << (5))").
> >
> > Use "#" instead of  __stringify() to fix this.
>
> Do we need the stringify.h include anymore then?

No we don't. I had planned to remove it, but forgot in the end :-(

Thanks, v2 sent.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds