[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807061939120.1592@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 19:39:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/7] x86/kvmclock: Decrapify kvm_register_clock()
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Decrapification went a bit too far...
>
> On 06/07/2018 18:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > - int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > - int low, high, ret;
> > struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src;
> > + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > + u64 pa;
> >
> > if (!hv_clock)
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > - src = &hv_clock[cpu].pvti;
>
> ... the line above should not have been a "-". That, or initialize it
> in the declaration. Whoever applies can fix it, no need to repost.
> I'll test with the above fix.
Indeed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists