[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7468cdd-1555-ef61-b475-3d4677aa423a@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 19:36:13 +0200
From: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] staging: rtl8723bs: fix indentation
On 07/08/18 18:46, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-07-08 at 12:38 +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
>> Remove unrequired extra indentations.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c
> []
>> @@ -69,16 +69,16 @@ int rtw_get_bit_value_from_ieee_value(u8 val)
>>
>> uint rtw_is_cckrates_included(u8 *rate)
>> {
>> - u32 i = 0;
>> + u32 i = 0;
>>
>> - while (rate[i] != 0) {
>> - if ((((rate[i]) & 0x7f) == 2) || (((rate[i]) & 0x7f) == 4) ||
>> - (((rate[i]) & 0x7f) == 11) || (((rate[i]) & 0x7f) == 22))
>> - return true;
>> - i++;
>> - }
>> + while (rate[i] != 0) {
>> + if ((((rate[i]) & 0x7f) == 2) || (((rate[i]) & 0x7f) == 4) ||
>> + (((rate[i]) & 0x7f) == 11) || (((rate[i]) & 0x7f) == 22))
>> + return true;
>> + i++;
>> + }
>>
>> - return false;
>> + return false;
>> }
>
> Hi Michael.
>
> Please try to improve the code for human readers and/or
> reduce overall object size over merely shutting up checkpatch
> style warnings.
>
Hi Joe,
I agree that it's better to improve the code than just silence
warnings.
Thanks for your advice.
> For instance:
>
> You could reduce object size a little by eliminating the
> multiple use of 0x7f and index and dereferencing the
> pointer instead.
>
> $ size drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.o*
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 10085 76 0 10161 27b1 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.o.new
> 10149 76 0 10225 27f1 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.o.old
>
> Something like:
>
> uint rtw_is_cckrates_included(u8 *rate)
> {
> while (*rate) {
> u8 r = *rate & 0x7f;
>
> if (r == 2 || r == 4 || r == 11 || r == 22)
> return true;
> rate++;
> }
>
> return false;
> }
>
> uint rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(u8 *rate)
> {
> while (*rate) {
> u8 r = *rate & 0x7f;
>
> if (r != 2 && r != 4 && r != 11 && r != 22)
> return false;
> rate++;
> }
>
> return true;
> }
>
The patch has been added to staging-testing already.
I will send patches with your suggestions the next days.
Thanks again.
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists