linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] staging: rtl8723bs: fix indentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:57:07 +0200
From:   Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] staging: rtl8723bs: fix indentation

On 07/08/18 19:36, Michael Straube wrote:
> On 07/08/18 18:46, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Sun, 2018-07-08 at 12:38 +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
>>
>> uint rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(u8 *rate)
>> {
>>     while (*rate) {
>>         u8 r = *rate & 0x7f;
>>
>>         if (r != 2 && r != 4 && r != 11 && r != 22)
>>             return false;
>>         rate++;
>>     }
>>
>>     return true;
>> }
>>
> 
> The patch has been added to staging-testing already.
> I will send patches with your suggestions the next days.

Would it be preferred to declare the variable at the functions beginning,
or doesn't it matter regarding coding style?

uint rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(u8 *rate)
{
         u8 r;

         while (*rate) {
                 r = *rate & 0x7f;
         ...

Best,
Michael