[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180708234630.GB700@sol.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 16:46:30 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH vfs/for-next 00/18] fs_context fixes
On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 02:01:36PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi David and Al, here are some fixes for the fs_context patches.
>
> Feel free to fold these into the original patches if you want.
>
> Patches 13-18 are cleanups only.
>
Also, mount(..., MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND, ...) now validates the mount options
string, which breaks systemd unit files with ProtectControlGroups=yes (e.g.
systemd-networkd.service) when systemd does the following to change a cgroup
(v1) mount to read-only:
mount(NULL, "/run/systemd/unit-root/sys/fs/cgroup/systemd", NULL, MS_RDONLY|MS_NOSUID|MS_NODEV|MS_NOEXEC|MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND, NULL)
... when the kernel has CONFIG_CGROUPS=y but no cgroup subsystems enabled, since
in that case the error "cgroup1: Need name or subsystem set" is hit when the
mount options string is empty.
Probably it doesn't make sense to validate the mount options string at all in
the MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND case, though maybe you had something else in mind.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists