linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] devres: Explicitly align datai[] to 64-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dda3e81c-cd16-5ebd-8c88-3fddd03108c4@synopsys.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jul 2018 13:28:08 -0700
From:   Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        'Mark Rutland' <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>,
        "will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] devres: Explicitly align datai[] to 64-bit

On 07/09/2018 09:10 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Mark Rutland
>> Sent: 09 July 2018 16:49
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:45:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:34:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:29:58PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>>> Shouldn't that be 8? AFAICT, __alignof__(unsigned long long) is 8 on
>>>>> x86_32:
>>>>
>>>> Curious, I wonder why we put that align in atomic64_32 then.
>>>
>>> Shiny, look at this: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54188
>>>
>>
>> Ouch.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> changing the definition to:
> struct ull {
>         unsigned long long v __attribute__((aligned(__alignof__(long long))));
> };
> 
> prints 8 for the structure alignment.

So this will help force alignment of outer structures triggered by inner members,
but only for globals and perhaps those on stack. I'm not sure how this helps
aligning such  a struct allocated dynamically - we are not passing this extra
alignment info the the allocator API here. Surely the size will increase and we
end up with extra padding in the end as intended originally and pointed to by
Mark, but how does it help with alignment ? What am I missing ?

> 
> Time to audit uses of __alignof__().
> 
> #define actual_alignof(type) __alignof__(struct { type jsdjdhjdjh; })