[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b42f7223e0e54a5589f75fc21039f348@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:10:19 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Mark Rutland' <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] devres: Explicitly align datai[] to 64-bit
From: Mark Rutland
> Sent: 09 July 2018 16:49
>
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:45:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:34:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:29:58PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > Shouldn't that be 8? AFAICT, __alignof__(unsigned long long) is 8 on
> > > > x86_32:
> > >
> > > Curious, I wonder why we put that align in atomic64_32 then.
> >
> > Shiny, look at this: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54188
> >
>
> Ouch.
Indeed.
changing the definition to:
struct ull {
unsigned long long v __attribute__((aligned(__alignof__(long long))));
};
prints 8 for the structure alignment.
Time to audit uses of __alignof__().
#define actual_alignof(type) __alignof__(struct { type jsdjdhjdjh; })
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists