[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJiuCcc-eGRr_RT01dNfhQso5PbXfWy+YZS4PHHcL=_yhA-3Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 17:22:04 +0200
From: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Colin Didier <colin.didier@...ialet.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Clément Peron <clement.peron@...ialet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Reintroduce i.MX EPIT Timer
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 at 17:12, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/07/2018 16:55, Clément Péron wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there still some remark against merging this ?
>
> How do you want this to be merged ?
>
> Shall I take the two patches related to the timer ? Or Ack them ?
I'm not an expert on how submitting patches works, it's the first
driver I submit.
But as this has been tested and no NXP team member seems against I
would be happy to see this patch merged.
Thanks,
Clement
>
> --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists