[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180711203317.GA14983@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:33:17 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: subhashj@...eaurora.org, cang@...eaurora.org,
vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
vinholikatti@...il.com, jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/9] scsi: ufs: add option to change default UFS power
management level
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 06:00:31PM +0530, Asutosh Das wrote:
> From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
>
> UFS device and link can be put in multiple different low power modes hence
> UFS driver supports multiple different low power modes. By default UFS
> driver selects the default (optimal) low power mode (which gives moderate
> power savings and have relatively less enter and exit latencies) but
> we might have to tune this default power mode for different chipset
> platforms to meet the low power requirements/goals. Hence this patch
> adds option to change default UFS low power mode (level).
>
> Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt | 11 ++++++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c | 14 +++++++++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 4 +--
> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> index c39dfef..f564d9a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> @@ -38,6 +38,15 @@ Optional properties:
> defined or a value in the array is "0" then it is assumed
> that the frequency is set by the parent clock or a
> fixed rate clock source.
> +- rpm-level : UFS Runtime power management level. Following PM levels are supported:
> + 0 - Both UFS device and Link in active state (Highest power consumption)
> + 1 - UFS device in active state but Link in Hibern8 state
> + 2 - UFS device in Sleep state but Link in active state
> + 3 - UFS device in Sleep state and Link in hibern8 state (default PM level)
> + 4 - UFS device in Power-down state and Link in Hibern8 state
> + 5 - UFS device in Power-down state and Link in OFF state (Lowest power consumption)
> +- spm-level : UFS System power management level. Allowed PM levels are same as rpm-level.
What's the default?
I assume these are minimums? The OS can pick higher power states. This
seems to be a bit Linux specific (as 'runtime PM' could be considered
Linux specific). For every other device, we don't put this type of
information in DT, but is user controlled. So really, wouldn't 1
property be sufficient for cases where a mode doesn't work due to
some h/w limitation. Otherwise, it is an OS or user decision.
> +
> -lanes-per-direction : number of lanes available per direction - either 1 or 2.
> Note that it is assume same number of lanes is used both
> directions at once. If not specified, default is 2 lanes per direction.
> @@ -66,4 +75,6 @@ Example:
> freq-table-hz = <100000000 200000000>, <0 0>, <0 0>;
> phys = <&ufsphy1>;
> phy-names = "ufsphy";
> + rpm-level = <3>;
Why specified if 3 is the default?
> + spm-level = <5>;
These seem like sane defaults. When and why would you use some
different?
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists