linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, page_alloc: double zone's batchsize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180711143505.5ccb378fb67dc6ba8fa202a3@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:35:05 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, page_alloc: double zone's batchsize

On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:58:55 +0800 Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com> wrote:

> [550 lines of changelog]

OK, I'm convinced ;)  That was a lot of work - thanks for being exhaustive.

Of course, not all the world is x86 but I think we can be confident
that other architectures are unlikely to be harmed by the change, at least.