[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f778198327e62cdab0651382740189e0665507a.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 01:40:41 +0000
From: "Lu, Aaron" <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Wang, Kemi" <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
"mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, page_alloc: double zone's batchsize
On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 14:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:58:55 +0800 Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > [550 lines of changelog]
>
> OK, I'm convinced ;) That was a lot of work - thanks for being exhaustive.
Thanks Andrew.
I think the credit goes to Dave Hansen since he has been very careful
about this change and would like me to do all those 2nd phase tests to
make sure we didn't get any surprise after doubling batch size :-)
I think the LKP robot will run even more tests to capture possible
regressions, if any.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists