[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3e2ca08-e22d-f16c-1c2e-9fb1985771ef@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:14:36 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel 4.17.4 lockup
On 07/11/2018 04:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Could the cause be an overflow of the IRQ stack? I’ve been meaning
> to put guard pages on all the special stacks for a while. Let me see
> if I can do that in the next couple days.
But what would that overflow into? Wouldn't it most likely be another
interrupt stack since they're all allocated together?
This looks more like thread stack corruption.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists