[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180711111754.GC1636@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:17:54 +0300
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
CC: Aapo Vienamo <avienamo@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] clk: tegra: refactor 7.1 div calculation
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:42:20AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 11/07/18 09:00, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:17:05PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> On 09/07/18 17:38, Aapo Vienamo wrote:
> >>> From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
> >>>
> >>> Move this to a separate file so it can be used to calculate the sdmmc
> >>> clock dividers.
> >>
> >> Sorry for not commenting sooner, but what is the motivation for moving
> >> this to its own file? I don't see why we need to do this in order to use
> >> elsewhere. Furthermore, the original file is quite aptly named 'clk-divider.c'
> >> and now we have a div71.c which seems quite specific.
> >
> > How else would you do it?
>
> Keep it in the same file?
>
That seems odd. clk-divider.c is meant to implement a clock type, not
utility functions we happen to need in several types.
Peter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists