[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180712112333.GA15277@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 04:23:33 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] 9p: Replace the fidlist with an IDR
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:17:26PM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote on Wed, Jul 11, 2018:
> > diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
> > index 389a2904b7b3..b89c7298267c 100644
> > --- a/net/9p/client.c
> > +++ b/net/9p/client.c
> > memset(&fid->qid, 0, sizeof(struct p9_qid));
>
> Ah, I had missed that you didn't update this memset as you said in reply
> to comment on v1.
Rather than update the memset, I ...
> Could you resend just this patch and either initialize fid->fid or use
> kzalloc for the fid allocation?
>
> > + fid->fid = 0;
Did that instead ;-)
If I were going to initialise the entire structure to 0, I'd replace
the kmalloc with kzalloc and drop the memset altogether.
> If you do resend, alignment here was wrong.
I think this warning from checkpatch is complete bullshit. It's
really none of checkpatch's business how I choose to align function
arguments.
That said, if you want it to be aligned some particular way, feel free
to adjust the whitespace. I don't care.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists