[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180712113056.GA23286@nautica>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:30:56 +0200
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] 9p: Replace the fidlist with an IDR
Matthew Wilcox wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2018:
> > Ah, I had missed that you didn't update this memset as you said in reply
> > to comment on v1.
>
> Rather than update the memset, I ...
>
> > Could you resend just this patch and either initialize fid->fid or use
> > kzalloc for the fid allocation?
> >
> > > + fid->fid = 0;
>
> Did that instead ;-)
>
> If I were going to initialise the entire structure to 0, I'd replace
> the kmalloc with kzalloc and drop the memset altogether.
Oh, I'm blind, sorry! :)
> > If you do resend, alignment here was wrong.
>
> I think this warning from checkpatch is complete bullshit. It's
> really none of checkpatch's business how I choose to align function
> arguments.
>
> That said, if you want it to be aligned some particular way, feel free
> to adjust the whitespace. I don't care.
I would tend to agree that sometimes checkpatch is overzealous, but
having worked on projects where code style is all over the place it
really feels much more comfortable to have a consistent style
everywhere.
Thanks for the permission, I'll adjust it (assuming this does end up
getting pulled from my branch, but nobody yelled so far)
--
Dominique Martinet
Powered by blists - more mailing lists