[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180712133220.GA21647@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:32:20 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.1 2/4] efi/arm: preserve early mapping of UEFI memory
map longer for BGRT
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:39:16PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 10 July 2018 at 19:57, James Morse <james.morse@....com> wrote:
> > Hi Ard,
> >
> > On 10/07/18 00:42, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> >>
> >> The BGRT code validates the contents of the table against the UEFI
> >> memory map, and so it expects it to be mapped when the code runs.
> >>
> >> On ARM, this is currently not the case, since we tear down the early
> >> mapping after efi_init() completes, and only create the permanent
> >> mapping in arm_enable_runtime_services(), which executes as an early
> >> initcall, but still leaves a window where the UEFI memory map is not
> >> mapped.
> >>
> >> So move the call to efi_memmap_unmap() from efi_init() to
> >> arm_enable_runtime_services().
> >
> > I don't have a machine that generates a BGRT, but I can see that efi_mem_type()
> > call in efi_bgrt_init() would cause the same problems we have with kexec and acpi.
> >
>
> I'm not sure I follow. The BGRT table only contains natively aligned
> fields, so the alignment faults should not occur when accessing this
> table after kexec. The issue addressed by this patch is that
> efi_mem_type() bails when called while EFI_MEMMAP is cleared.
>
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
> >> index b5214c143fee..388a929baf95 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
> >> @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
> >>
> >> reserve_regions();
> >> efi_esrt_init();
> >> - efi_memmap_unmap();
> >>
> >> memblock_reserve(params.mmap & PAGE_MASK,
> >> PAGE_ALIGN(params.mmap_size +
> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> >> index 5889cbea60b8..59a8c0ec94d5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> >> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ static int __init arm_enable_runtime_services(void)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + efi_memmap_unmap();
> >
> > This can get called twice if uefi_init() fails after setting the EFI_BOOT flag,
> > but this can only happen if the system table signature is wrong, (or we're out
> > of memory really early).
> >
>
> I guess we should check the EFI_MEMMAP attribute here as well then.
Do you plan to spin a new version of this patch?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists