linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3.1 2/4] efi/arm: preserve early mapping of UEFI memory map longer for BGRT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_+XcOFfJBhVaQp3yUZ36Q5gS47vJzFMniwQ2DZp062tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jul 2018 16:14:00 +0200
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
        Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
        Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.1 2/4] efi/arm: preserve early mapping of UEFI memory
 map longer for BGRT

On 12 July 2018 at 15:32, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:39:16PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 10 July 2018 at 19:57, James Morse <james.morse@....com> wrote:
>> > Hi Ard,
>> >
>> > On 10/07/18 00:42, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>> >> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
>> >>
>> >> The BGRT code validates the contents of the table against the UEFI
>> >> memory map, and so it expects it to be mapped when the code runs.
>> >>
>> >> On ARM, this is currently not the case, since we tear down the early
>> >> mapping after efi_init() completes, and only create the permanent
>> >> mapping in arm_enable_runtime_services(), which executes as an early
>> >> initcall, but still leaves a window where the UEFI memory map is not
>> >> mapped.
>> >>
>> >> So move the call to efi_memmap_unmap() from efi_init() to
>> >> arm_enable_runtime_services().
>> >
>> > I don't have a machine that generates a BGRT, but I can see that efi_mem_type()
>> > call in efi_bgrt_init() would cause the same problems we have with kexec and acpi.
>> >
>>
>> I'm not sure I follow. The BGRT table only contains natively aligned
>> fields, so the alignment faults should not occur when accessing this
>> table after kexec. The issue addressed by this patch is that
>> efi_mem_type() bails when called while EFI_MEMMAP is cleared.
>>
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
>> >> index b5214c143fee..388a929baf95 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
>> >> @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
>> >>
>> >>       reserve_regions();
>> >>       efi_esrt_init();
>> >> -     efi_memmap_unmap();
>> >>
>> >>       memblock_reserve(params.mmap & PAGE_MASK,
>> >>                        PAGE_ALIGN(params.mmap_size +
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
>> >> index 5889cbea60b8..59a8c0ec94d5 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
>> >> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ static int __init arm_enable_runtime_services(void)
>> >>               return 0;
>> >>       }
>> >>
>> >> +     efi_memmap_unmap();
>> >
>> > This can get called twice if uefi_init() fails after setting the EFI_BOOT flag,
>> > but this can only happen if the system table signature is wrong, (or we're out
>> > of memory really early).
>> >
>>
>> I guess we should check the EFI_MEMMAP attribute here as well then.
>
> Do you plan to spin a new version of this patch?
>

Either that or fold in the hunk below.


--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int __init arm_enable_runtime_services(void)
 {
        u64 mapsize;

-       if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT)) {
+       if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) || !efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP)) {
                pr_info("EFI services will not be available.\n");
                return 0;
        }