[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180715225951.GC30102@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:59:52 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, kernel-team@...com, efault@....de,
tglx@...utronix.de, songliubraving@...com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on
nr_cpu_ids
* Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com> wrote:
> The mm_struct always contains a cpumask bitmap, regardless of
> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. That means the first step can be to
> simplify things, and simply have one bitmask at the end of the
> mm_struct for the mm_cpumask.
>
> This does necessitate moving everything else in mm_struct into
> an anonymous sub-structure, which can be randomized when struct
> randomization is enabled.
>
> The second step is to determine the correct size for the
> mm_struct slab object from the size of the mm_struct
> (excluding the cpu bitmap) and the size the cpumask.
>
> For init_mm we can simply allocate the maximum size this
> kernel is compiled for, since we only have one init_mm
> in the system, anyway.
>
> Pointer magic by Mike Galbraith, to evade -Wstringop-overflow
> getting confused by the dynamically sized array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Is this an Acked-by in disguise, or did this patch route via Mike?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists