lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ0ufcXDbxHsvuXO59Ot3g7L57gk8CJuOGWwmHK7VA9Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 14:45:36 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the pinctrl tree

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:29 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> In the tree I fetched this morning, those commits are all committed by
> you, but you did not add a Signed-off-by to then.  This usually happens
> when you rebase a branch/tree.

Ah sorry man. Mark Brown told me the same thing this morning in
conversation, and of course I need to sign them off as I am now on
the delivery path.

Sorry for the fuzz :(

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ