linux-kernel - Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the virtio transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180716133847.GA9421@nautica>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:38:47 +0200
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To:     jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the
 virtio transport

jiangyiwen wrote on Mon, Jul 16, 2018:
> You're right, this wake up operation should be put after the unlocking,
> I will resend it. In addition, whether I should resend this patch based
> on your 9p-next branch?

There is a trivial conflict with Thomas' validate PDU length patch,
but as it is trivial either work for me - pick whichever is easier to
work with for you.

The main reason I asked for a new version of the other patch is that the
IDR rework changed spin locks, so I'd rather it being clean.


Thanks,
-- 
Dominique