linux-kernel - Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the virtio transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B4D426F.8050605@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jul 2018 09:12:15 +0800
From:   jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>
To:     Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] net/9p: Fix a deadlock case in the
 virtio transport

On 2018/7/16 21:38, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> jiangyiwen wrote on Mon, Jul 16, 2018:
>> You're right, this wake up operation should be put after the unlocking,
>> I will resend it. In addition, whether I should resend this patch based
>> on your 9p-next branch?
> 
> There is a trivial conflict with Thomas' validate PDU length patch,
> but as it is trivial either work for me - pick whichever is easier to
> work with for you.
> 
> The main reason I asked for a new version of the other patch is that the
> IDR rework changed spin locks, so I'd rather it being clean.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 

ok, I will resend the patch later based on linux-next branch.

Thanks,
Yiwen.