[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180718105721.rcd6l7s6l4yfbahg@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:57:21 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drivers/md/raid5: Use irqsave variant of
atomic_dec_and_lock()
On 2018-07-16 17:37:27 [-0700], Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 02:27:40PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2018-07-03 22:01:36 [+0200], To linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org wrote:
> > > From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
> > >
> > > The irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock handles irqsave/restore when
> > > taking/releasing the spin lock. With this variant the call of
> > > local_irq_save is no longer required.
> >
> > Shaohua, are you with this?
>
> Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
Thank you.
Is there a reason why you did not apply it or are you too busy now and
do it later (and just signal the ack that you are fine with it)?
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists