[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180719024405.GA99813@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:44:05 -0700
From: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drivers/md/raid5: Use irqsave variant of
atomic_dec_and_lock()
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:57:21PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-07-16 17:37:27 [-0700], Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 02:27:40PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2018-07-03 22:01:36 [+0200], To linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org wrote:
> > > > From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
> > > >
> > > > The irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock handles irqsave/restore when
> > > > taking/releasing the spin lock. With this variant the call of
> > > > local_irq_save is no longer required.
> > >
> > > Shaohua, are you with this?
> >
> > Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
>
> Thank you.
> Is there a reason why you did not apply it or are you too busy now and
> do it later (and just signal the ack that you are fine with it)?
Since you sent a series, I suppose you want someone else to take it. But I can
take it for sure, will do soon.
Thanks,
Shaohua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists