linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 4/8] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: Optimize pointer resolution on read/write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180719082538.222396bf@bbrezillon>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:25:38 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
Cc:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/8] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: Optimize pointer
 resolution on read/write

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 01:57:06 +0200
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com> wrote:

> Further optimize processing speed of read/write callback functions by
> resolving private structure pointer only once per callback and passing
> it to all subfunctions instead of mtd_info.

Not sure this has a real impact on perfs, but I also prefer not using
mtd_info objects within NAND drivers, so I'm good with the change
itself (its probably worth changing the commit message though)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c
> index dfefcd79b420..d7e4c9dbef67 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ams-delta.c
> @@ -72,10 +72,9 @@ static const struct mtd_partition partition_info[] = {
>  	  .size		=  3 * SZ_256K },
>  };
>  
> -static void ams_delta_write_next_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char byte)
> +static void ams_delta_write_next_byte(struct ams_delta_nand *priv, u_char byte)
>  {
> -	struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> -	struct ams_delta_nand *priv = nand_get_controller_data(this);
> +	struct nand_chip *this = &priv->nand_chip;
>  
>  	writew(byte, this->IO_ADDR_W);
>  	gpiod_set_value(priv->gpiod_nwe, 0);
> @@ -83,21 +82,18 @@ static void ams_delta_write_next_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char byte)
>  	gpiod_set_value(priv->gpiod_nwe, 1);
>  }
>  
> -static void ams_delta_write_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char byte)
> +static void ams_delta_write_first_byte(struct ams_delta_nand *priv, u_char byte)
>  {
> -	struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> -	struct ams_delta_nand *priv = nand_get_controller_data(this);
>  	void __iomem *io_base = priv->io_base;
>  
>  	writew(0, io_base + OMAP_MPUIO_IO_CNTL);
>  
> -	ams_delta_write_next_byte(mtd, byte);
> +	ams_delta_write_next_byte(priv, byte);
>  }
>  
> -static u_char ams_delta_read_next_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +static u_char ams_delta_read_next_byte(struct ams_delta_nand *priv)
>  {
> -	struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> -	struct ams_delta_nand *priv = nand_get_controller_data(this);
> +	struct nand_chip *this = &priv->nand_chip;
>  	u_char res;
>  
>  	gpiod_set_value(priv->gpiod_nre, 0);
> @@ -108,36 +104,46 @@ static u_char ams_delta_read_next_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  	return res;
>  }
>  
> -static u_char ams_delta_read_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +static u_char ams_delta_read_first_byte(struct ams_delta_nand *priv)
>  {
> -	struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> -	struct ams_delta_nand *priv = nand_get_controller_data(this);
>  	void __iomem *io_base = priv->io_base;
>  
>  	writew(~0, io_base + OMAP_MPUIO_IO_CNTL);
>  
> -	return ams_delta_read_next_byte(mtd);
> +	return ams_delta_read_next_byte(priv);
> +}
> +
> +static u_char ams_delta_read_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> +	struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> +	struct ams_delta_nand *priv = nand_get_controller_data(this);
> +
> +	return ams_delta_read_first_byte(priv);
>  }
>  
>  static void ams_delta_write_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u_char *buf,
>  				int len)
>  {
> +	struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> +	struct ams_delta_nand *priv = nand_get_controller_data(this);
>  	int i;
>  
>  	if (len > 0)
> -		ams_delta_write_byte(mtd, buf[0]);
> +		ams_delta_write_first_byte(priv, buf[0]);
>  	for (i = 1; i < len; i++)
> -		ams_delta_write_next_byte(mtd, buf[i]);
> +		ams_delta_write_next_byte(priv, buf[i]);
>  }
>  
>  static void ams_delta_read_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *buf, int len)
>  {
> +	struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> +	struct ams_delta_nand *priv = nand_get_controller_data(this);
>  	int i;
>  
>  	if (len > 0)
> -		buf[0] = ams_delta_read_byte(mtd);
> +		buf[0] = ams_delta_read_first_byte(priv);
>  	for (i = 1; i < len; i++)
> -		buf[i] = ams_delta_read_next_byte(mtd);
> +		buf[i] = ams_delta_read_next_byte(priv);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -161,7 +167,7 @@ static void ams_delta_hwcontrol(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (cmd != NAND_CMD_NONE)
> -		ams_delta_write_byte(mtd, cmd);
> +		ams_delta_write_first_byte(priv, cmd);
>  }
>  
>  static int ams_delta_nand_ready(struct mtd_info *mtd)