[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807190818110.1689@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:25:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
prarit@...hat.com, feng.tang@...el.com, pmladek@...e.com,
gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 20/25] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Dou Liyang wrote:
> At 07/18/2018 10:22 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > + (unsigned long)cpu_khz % KHZ);
> > if (cpu_khz != tsc_khz) {
> > pr_info("Detected %lu.%03lu MHz TSC",
> > - (unsigned long)tsc_khz / 1000,
> > - (unsigned long)tsc_khz % 1000);
> > + (unsigned long)tsc_khz / KHZ,
> > + (unsigned long)tsc_khz % KHZ);
> > + }
>
> this curly brackets can be removed
No. They want to stay, really.
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1701171956290.3645@nanos
The pr_info() is a multiline statement due to the line breaks.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists