[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82b363bb-de81-0ddf-cb0d-83945eba72f0@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:48:28 +0800
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
<steven.sistare@...cle.com>, <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
<heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
<sboyd@...eaurora.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <prarit@...hat.com>,
<feng.tang@...el.com>, <pmladek@...e.com>,
<gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <jgross@...e.com>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 20/25] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once
Hi Thomas,
At 07/19/2018 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Dou Liyang wrote:
>> At 07/18/2018 10:22 AM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
>>> + (unsigned long)cpu_khz % KHZ);
>>> if (cpu_khz != tsc_khz) {
>>> pr_info("Detected %lu.%03lu MHz TSC",
>>> - (unsigned long)tsc_khz / 1000,
>>> - (unsigned long)tsc_khz % 1000);
>>> + (unsigned long)tsc_khz / KHZ,
>>> + (unsigned long)tsc_khz % KHZ);
>>> + }
>>
>> this curly brackets can be removed
>
> No. They want to stay, really.
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1701171956290.3645@nanos
>
> The pr_info() is a multiline statement due to the line breaks.
>
I see, I’ll keep that in mind.
Thanks,
dou
Powered by blists - more mailing lists