[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2173334.CLADOdgFxd@avalon>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:14:06 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: jacopo mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v4 2/3] media: ov772x: use SCCB regmap
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 11:42:08 EEST Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > -static int ov772x_mask_set(struct i2c_client *client, u8 command, u8
> > > mask,
> > > - u8 set)
> > > -{
> > > - s32 val = ov772x_read(client, command);
> > > -
> > > - if (val < 0)
> > > - return val;
> > > -
> > > - val &= ~mask;
> > > - val |= set & mask;
> > > -
> > > - return ov772x_write(client, command, val);
> > > -}
> > > -
> >
> > If I were you I would have kept these functions and wrapped the regmap
> > operations there. This is not an issue though if you prefer it this
> > way :)
>
> I have suggested this way. It is not a show stopper issue, but I still
> like this version better.
Wrapping the regmap functions minimizes the diff and makes it easier to
backport the driver.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists