[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7h601be2vk.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:06:39 -0500
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>
Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, <qianggui.song@...ogic.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <bo.yang@...ogic.com>,
<sboyd@...nel.org>, <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,
<xingyu.chen@...ogic.com>, <qiufang.dai@...ogic.com>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, <sunny.luo@...ogic.com>,
<carlo@...one.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: meson-g12a: Add EE Clock controller driver
Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com> writes:
[...]
>>
>> As Jerome said, I think consistency is an important goal, so leaving off
>> the "meson-" for drivers/clk is fine with me.
>>
> ok
>
>> Also for consistency, for the rest of the drivers, keeping "meson-" is
>> probably the right thing to do.
>>
> ok, for the above, you are talking about the already exist compatible
> names? or the patches we will push in the future?
I'm talking about future patches.
>> However, patches would be welcome to add compatibles without the "meson"
>> for the rest of the drivers & documentation as well, but please do not
>> remove any compatibles.
>>
> I assume you are talking about the patches in the future we will push?
> to drop the "meson".
>
> I'm confused here, as the above two paragraphs conflict with each other
Yeah, what I wrote is confusing, sorry about that.
What I mean is that new patches should stay consistent with compatibles
in their existing drivers/subsystems. That means keeping the "meson-"
prefix for everything except drivers/clk.
In addition to that, patches would be welcome for *adding* compatibles
without "meson" to all the current drivers.
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists