| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20180719140745.4503-1-msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:07:45 -0400
From: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: Fix out of bound in PCI multi segment env
From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
KASAN reported the following slab-out-of-bounds when sb_edac
module was loaded on Broadwell machine which has two PCI segments.
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sbridge_get_all_devices.constprop.14+0x75f/0x96a [sb_edac]
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8c0d44dfe850 by task modprobe/4221
CPU: 19 PID: 4221 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 4.18.0-rc5 #2
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xc2/0x16b
? show_regs_print_info+0x5/0x5
? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xd9/0xd9
? pci_get_dev_by_id+0x57/0x70
? pci_get_device+0x155/0x210
print_address_description+0x6a/0x270
kasan_report+0x258/0x380
? sbridge_get_all_devices.constprop.14+0x75f/0x96a [sb_edac]
sbridge_get_all_devices.constprop.14+0x75f/0x96a [sb_edac]
...
Allocated by task 4221:
kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xd0
__kmalloc+0x112/0x230
sbridge_get_all_devices.constprop.14+0x555/0x96a [sb_edac]
sbridge_init+0x1ba/0x4000 [sb_edac]
do_one_initcall+0xaa/0x401
do_init_module+0x20b/0x676
load_module+0x443f/0x6dc0
__do_sys_finit_module+0x25f/0x2c0
do_syscall_64+0x14e/0x4b0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
...
==================================================================
The out bounds happened because the index of sbridge_dev->pdev[] is over
than the allocated size.
---
static int sbridge_get_onedevice(struct pci_dev **prev,
...
if (sbridge_dev->pdev[sbridge_dev->i_devs]) { <= !! out bounds HERE !!
sbridge_printk(KERN_ERR,
"Duplicated device for %04x:%04x\n",
PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, dev_descr->dev_id);
---
If a sbridge_dev which has the same bus as the new device is already exists,
the sbridge_dev is assigned to the new one.
---
static struct sbridge_dev *get_sbridge_dev(u8 bus, enum domain dom, int multi_bus,
struct sbridge_dev *prev)
...
list_for_each_entry_from(sbridge_dev, &sbridge_edac_list, list) {
if (sbridge_dev->bus == bus && (dom == SOCK || dom == sbridge_dev->dom))
return sbridge_dev;
}
---
If the system has multi PCI segment and the each bus number is same,
the same sbridge_dev is assigned. So, the index of sbridge_dev->pdev[]
is incremented by each segments.
As the result, the index is over than the allocated size, then the
out-of-bounds happens.
This patch introduces a segment member to sbridge_dev to separate
it each PCI segments.
Fixes: e2f747b1f42a ("EDAC, sb_edac: Assign EDAC memory controller per h/w controller")
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
index 4a89c80..07726fb 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ struct pci_id_table {
struct sbridge_dev {
struct list_head list;
+ int seg;
u8 bus, mc;
u8 node_id, source_id;
struct pci_dev **pdev;
@@ -729,7 +730,8 @@ static inline int numcol(u32 mtr)
return 1 << cols;
}
-static struct sbridge_dev *get_sbridge_dev(u8 bus, enum domain dom, int multi_bus,
+static struct sbridge_dev *get_sbridge_dev(int seg, u8 bus, enum domain dom,
+ int multi_bus,
struct sbridge_dev *prev)
{
struct sbridge_dev *sbridge_dev;
@@ -747,14 +749,15 @@ static struct sbridge_dev *get_sbridge_dev(u8 bus, enum domain dom, int multi_bu
: sbridge_edac_list.next, struct sbridge_dev, list);
list_for_each_entry_from(sbridge_dev, &sbridge_edac_list, list) {
- if (sbridge_dev->bus == bus && (dom == SOCK || dom == sbridge_dev->dom))
+ if ((sbridge_dev->seg == seg) && (sbridge_dev->bus == bus) &&
+ (dom == SOCK || dom == sbridge_dev->dom))
return sbridge_dev;
}
return NULL;
}
-static struct sbridge_dev *alloc_sbridge_dev(u8 bus, enum domain dom,
+static struct sbridge_dev *alloc_sbridge_dev(int seg, u8 bus, enum domain dom,
const struct pci_id_table *table)
{
struct sbridge_dev *sbridge_dev;
@@ -771,6 +774,7 @@ static struct sbridge_dev *alloc_sbridge_dev(u8 bus, enum domain dom,
return NULL;
}
+ sbridge_dev->seg = seg;
sbridge_dev->bus = bus;
sbridge_dev->dom = dom;
sbridge_dev->n_devs = table->n_devs_per_imc;
@@ -2246,6 +2250,7 @@ static int sbridge_get_onedevice(struct pci_dev **prev,
struct sbridge_dev *sbridge_dev = NULL;
const struct pci_id_descr *dev_descr = &table->descr[devno];
struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
+ int seg = 0;
u8 bus = 0;
int i = 0;
@@ -2276,10 +2281,12 @@ static int sbridge_get_onedevice(struct pci_dev **prev,
/* End of list, leave */
return -ENODEV;
}
+ seg = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
bus = pdev->bus->number;
next_imc:
- sbridge_dev = get_sbridge_dev(bus, dev_descr->dom, multi_bus, sbridge_dev);
+ sbridge_dev = get_sbridge_dev(seg, bus, dev_descr->dom,
+ multi_bus, sbridge_dev);
if (!sbridge_dev) {
/* If the HA1 wasn't found, don't create EDAC second memory controller */
if (dev_descr->dom == IMC1 && devno != 1) {
@@ -2292,7 +2299,7 @@ static int sbridge_get_onedevice(struct pci_dev **prev,
if (dev_descr->dom == SOCK)
goto out_imc;
- sbridge_dev = alloc_sbridge_dev(bus, dev_descr->dom, table);
+ sbridge_dev = alloc_sbridge_dev(seg, bus, dev_descr->dom, table);
if (!sbridge_dev) {
pci_dev_put(pdev);
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists