[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1532204819.26720.68.camel@baylibre.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 22:26:59 +0200
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: meson: clk-pll: add enable bit
On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 21:48 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > @@ -250,11 +264,15 @@ static const struct reg_sequence axg_hifi_init_regs[] = {
> > { .reg = HHI_HIFI_PLL_CNTL3, .def = 0x0a6a3a88 },
> > { .reg = HHI_HIFI_PLL_CNTL4, .def = 0xc000004d },
> > { .reg = HHI_HIFI_PLL_CNTL5, .def = 0x00058000 },
> > - { .reg = HHI_HIFI_PLL_CNTL, .def = 0x40010250 },
>
> is this change on purpose? this line set en, m, n, l and od before
> maybe you can document it in the commit message
Yes the change is on purpose, but as you pointed out it is worth a comment
Actually, when taking od out of the pll driver, I remembered this 'initial
setting' and it kinda bothered me
If the od divider registers after the DCO, the value could have changed with it,
which is why I wanted to remove the write on this register
As you pointed out, in this register, we find m, n, od ... and enable. In a way,
removing this register setting was the reason why I wanted to add the enable bit
to begin with :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists