| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180722182043.4c752d15@archlinux>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:20:43 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, andy.gross@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
jonathan@...ek.ca, jmaneyrol@...ensense.com, knaack.h@....de,
lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net, mkelly@...o.com,
fischerdouglasc@...il.com, bshah@....org, ctatlor97@...il.com,
drew.paterson@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] iio: imu: mpu6050: add support for regulator
framework
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 12:31:45 +0000
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 06:31:07PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 04:41:52 -0400
> > Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch adds support for the regulator framework to the mpu6050
> > > driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
> >
> > I'm not 100% sure what the purpose of the regulator_enabled
> > tracking is. Perhaps you could point out the path where that is
> > needed?
>
> I was thinking about the use case where the device is compiled into the
> kernel as a module, the device is suspended, and then someone rmmods
> the module. If that is not a use case that I need to worry about, then
> the flag can go away and it will simplify the code.
I'm not sure it's a situation that can actually happen.
Before a rmmod is acted upon I think it will always be un-suspended.
This is necessary to avoid all sorts of nasty corner cases.
It's been debate in the past on whether it is necessary to come
out of runtime suspend under these sorts of circumstances but
I don't think anyone has ever tried to make suspend and remove
play nicely.
Jonathan
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> > Also, a missing bit of documentation needs adding.
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > - Use devm_regulator_get() instead of devm_regulator_get_optional()
> > > - Use devm_add_action() for cleaning up the regulator.
> > > - Correct ordering of resume code.
> > > - Add regulator_enabled flag to ensure regulator is not disabled twice,
> > > specifically the case where the device is suspended and then the
> > > driver is removed.
> > >
> > > Original extra changelog from v1:
> > >
> > > This is a variation of Jonathan Marek's patch from postmarketOS
> > > https://gitlab.com/postmarketOS/linux-postmarketos/commit/b8ad1ec1859c8bbcbce94944b3f4dd68f8f9fc37
> > > with the following changes:
> > >
> > > - Stripped out 6515 variant code.
> > > - Add the regulator to the mpu core instead of only the i2c variant.
> > > - Add error handling.
> > > - Release the regulator on suspend, device remove, etc.
> > > - Device tree documentation.
> > >
> > > .../bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt | 1 +
> > > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h | 3 +
> > > 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt
> > > index b7def51c8ad9..d39907b12a46 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt
> > > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Required properties:
> > > bindings.
> > >
> > > Optional properties:
> > > + - vddio-supply: regulator phandle for VDDIO supply
> > > - mount-matrix: an optional 3x3 mounting rotation matrix
> > > - i2c-gate node. These devices also support an auxiliary i2c bus. This is
> > > simple enough to be described using the i2c-gate binding. See
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > > index 12c1b9507007..e1fbab4bc0a0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > > #include "inv_mpu_iio.h"
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -926,6 +927,46 @@ static int inv_check_and_setup_chip(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st)
> > > return result;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int inv_mpu_core_enable_regulator(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st)
> > > +{
> > > + int result;
> > > +
> > > + result = regulator_enable(st->vddio_supply);
> > > + if (result) {
> > > + dev_err(regmap_get_device(st->map),
> > > + "Failed to enable regulator: %d\n", result);
> > > + } else {
> > > + st->regulator_enabled = true;
> > > +
> > > + /* Give the device a little bit of time to start up. */
> > > + usleep_range(35000, 70000);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return result;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st)
> > > +{
> > > + int result;
> > > +
> > > + if (!st->regulator_enabled)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + result = regulator_disable(st->vddio_supply);
> > > + if (result)
> > > + dev_err(regmap_get_device(st->map),
> > > + "Failed to disable regulator: %d\n", result);
> > > +
> > > + st->regulator_enabled = false;
> > > +
> > > + return result;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action(void *_data)
> > > +{
> > > + inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator(_data);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int inv_mpu_core_probe(struct regmap *regmap, int irq, const char *name,
> > > int (*inv_mpu_bus_setup)(struct iio_dev *), int chip_type)
> > > {
> > > @@ -990,6 +1031,28 @@ int inv_mpu_core_probe(struct regmap *regmap, int irq, const char *name,
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + st->vddio_supply = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vddio");
> > > + if (IS_ERR(st->vddio_supply)) {
> > > + if (PTR_ERR(st->vddio_supply) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get vddio regulator %d\n",
> > > + (int)PTR_ERR(st->vddio_supply));
> > > +
> > > + return PTR_ERR(st->vddio_supply);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + result = inv_mpu_core_enable_regulator(st);
> > > + if (result)
> > > + return result;
> > > +
> > > + result = devm_add_action(dev, inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action,
> > > + st);
> > > + if (result) {
> > > + inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator_action(st);
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to setup regulator cleanup action %d\n",
> > > + result);
> > > + return result;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > /* power is turned on inside check chip type*/
> > > result = inv_check_and_setup_chip(st);
> > > if (result)
> > > @@ -1049,7 +1112,12 @@ static int inv_mpu_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > int result;
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> > > + result = inv_mpu_core_enable_regulator(st);
> > > + if (result)
> > > + goto out_unlock;
> > > +
> > > result = inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(st, true);
> > > +out_unlock:
> > > mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> > >
> > > return result;
> > > @@ -1062,6 +1130,11 @@ static int inv_mpu_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> > > result = inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(st, false);
> > > + if (result)
> > > + goto out_unlock;
> > > +
> > > + result = inv_mpu_core_disable_regulator(st);
> > > +out_unlock:
> > > mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> > >
> > > return result;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > > index e69a59659dbc..01c8fe9b4fa0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct inv_mpu6050_hw {
> > > * @chip_period: chip internal period estimation (~1kHz).
> > > * @it_timestamp: timestamp from previous interrupt.
> > > * @data_timestamp: timestamp for next data sample.
> > > + * @vddio_supply voltage regulator for the chip.
> > Docs missing for regulator_enabled.
> > > */
> > > struct inv_mpu6050_state {
> > > struct mutex lock;
> > > @@ -149,6 +150,8 @@ struct inv_mpu6050_state {
> > > s64 chip_period;
> > > s64 it_timestamp;
> > > s64 data_timestamp;
> > > + struct regulator *vddio_supply;
> > > + bool regulator_enabled;
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*register and associated bit definition*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists