linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] touchscreen: elants: Use octal permissions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:18:31 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     dev-harsh1998 <harshitjain6751@...il.com>, trivial@...nel.org,
        Simon Budig <simon.budig@...nelconcepts.de>,
        Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>,
        Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] touchscreen: elants: Use octal permissions

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 03:32:00PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 06:49:20PM +0530, dev-harsh1998 wrote:
> > WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO' are not preferred. Consider using octal permissions '0444'.
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR(iap_mode, S_IRUGO, show_iap_mode, NULL);
> > 
> > WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IWUSR' are not preferred. Consider using octal permissions '0200'.
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR(update_fw, S_IWUSR, NULL, write_update_fw)
> > 
> > WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO' are not preferred. Consider using octal permissions '0444'.
> > +		.dattr = __ATTR(_field, S_IRUGO,			\
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Harshit Jain <harshitjain6751@...il.com>
> 
> This name doesn't match up with the From: line above :(
> 
> Please fix up and try again.

dtor@...r-ws:~/kernel/linux-next$ git grep S_IRU | wc -l
7605

We either need to run a tree-wide script or leave this alone. FWIW I am
perfectly fine with either octals or symbolic names so I do not see
benefit of doing conversion for code that is not known to be broken.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry