[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7441b5ef-18d8-13aa-ef4d-40fe684c9218@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:38:08 -0700
From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: jgg@...pe.ca, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: add support for partial reads
On 07/23/2018 02:13 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> The current patch does, you even provided a use case in your last email
> (it's do command to get sizing followed by do command with correctly
> sized buffer).
The example I provided was: #1 send a command, #2 read the response header
(10 bytes), get the actual response size from the header and then #3 read
the full response (response size - size of the header bytes).
>
> However, if you tie it to O_NONBLOCK, it won't because no-one currently
> opens the TPM device non blocking so it's an ABI conformant
> discriminator of the uses. Tying to O_NONBLOCK should be simple
> because it's in file->f_flags.
I think that it might be an option. Especially that I have this on top of
the async patch. Let's discuss this when Jarkko is back.
Thanks,
--
Tadeusz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists